MediaTek MT6735T vs Rockchip RK3126C

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6735T vs Rockchip RK3126C, comparison of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6735T is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Rockchip RK3126C is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Octane V2, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, GeekBench 6, 5, Neocore, Quadrant, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy MT6735T or Rockchip RK3126C and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6735T

Rockchip RK3126C

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6735T

26%

Rockchip RK3126C

32%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6735T

Rockchip RK3126C

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6735T	Rockchip RK3126C
Total score	23688	19847
CPU	6630	5558
GPU	8997	7536
MEM	3787	3169
UX	4266	3579

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6735T	Rockchip RK3126C
Single-Core	62	52
Multi-Core	289	242

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6735T	Rockchip RK3126C
Frequency	1000 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	667
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Rockchip RK3126C is 23% better than MT6735T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	20.4	9
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 800 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	6.9	3.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.2	14.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	12.7	8.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	11.9	6.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.3	10.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.3	18.2
Real Racing 3	22.2	10.8
Sniper 3D	20.3	11.2
Need for Speed No Limits	17.8	12
Mortal Kombat X	18.4	9.9
CSR Racing 2	15.2	12

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	8 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735T is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3126C is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6735T and Rockchip RK3126C, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6735T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6735T specs and review.

Rockchip RK3126C SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Rockchip RK3126C specs and review.