|
MediaTek MT6735T vs MediaTek MT6732 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6735T vs MediaTek MT6732, comparison of GPUs Mali-T760 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2. This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6735T is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6732 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software such as Neocore, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, and how good the CPUs are in games Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, PUBG etc. After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy MT6735T or MT6732 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6735T |
MT6732 | Total score | 23688 | 33768 | CPU | 6630 | 9445 | GPU | 8997 | 12832 | MEM | 3787 | 5410 | UX | 4266 | 6088 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6735T |
MT6732 | Single-Core | 62 | 89 | Multi-Core | 289 | 412 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6735T |
MT6732 | Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1500 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 (Single Channel) | LPDDR3 (Single Channel) | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 800 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6732 is 33% better than MT6735T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T720 MP2 | Mali-T760 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 20.4 | 47.6 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 720 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 6.9 | 10.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 18.2 | 27.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 12.7 | 18.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 11.9 | 16.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 15.3 | 22.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 23.3 | 34.3 | Real Racing 3 | 22.2 | 22.9 | Sniper 3D | 20.3 | 34.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 17.8 | 32.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 18.4 | 26.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 15.2 | 23.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735T is better: 1
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6732 is better: 23 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT6735T SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731
MT6732 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
| |
|