MediaTek MT6735T vs MediaTek MT6732

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6735T vs MediaTek MT6732, comparison of GPUs Mali-T760 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6735T is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6732 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software such as Neocore, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, and how good the CPUs are in games Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, PUBG etc.

After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy MT6735T or MT6732 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6735T

MT6732

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6735T

26%

MT6732

23%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6735T

MT6732

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6735T	MT6732
Total score	23688	33768
CPU	6630	9445
GPU	8997	12832
MEM	3787	5410
UX	4266	6088

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6735T	MT6732
Single-Core	62	89
Multi-Core	289	412

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6735T	MT6732
Frequency	1000 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	800
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6732 is 33% better than MT6735T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T760 MP2
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	20.4	47.6
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	6.9	10.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	18.2	27.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	12.7	18.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	11.9	16.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.3	22.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	23.3	34.3
Real Racing 3	22.2	22.9
Sniper 3D	20.3	34.8
Need for Speed No Limits	17.8	32.9
Mortal Kombat X	18.4	26.5
CSR Racing 2	15.2	23.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735T is better: 1
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6732 is better: 23
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6735T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6735T specs and review.

MT6732 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6732 specs and review.