MediaTek MT6732 vs MediaTek MT6737T

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6732 vs MediaTek MT6737T, comparison of GPUs Mali-T760 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6732 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6737T is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, and how good the SoCs are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy MT6732 or MT6737T and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6732

MT6737T

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6732

23%

MT6737T

27%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6732

MT6737T

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6732	MT6737T
Total score	33768	38244
CPU	9445	10710
GPU	12832	14523
MEM	5410	6121
UX	6088	6884

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6732	MT6737T
Single-Core	89	101
Multi-Core	412	467

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6732	MT6737T
Frequency	1500 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)	LPDDR2, LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	800	733
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T760 MP2	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	47.6	20.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	10.4	12.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	27.5	31.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	18.3	20.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	16.6	17.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	22.6	26.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	34.3	39.2
Real Racing 3	22.9	31.1
Sniper 3D	34.8	39.3
Need for Speed No Limits	32.9	24.8
Mortal Kombat X	26.5	23.8
CSR Racing 2	23.8	24.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6732 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737T is better: 18
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs MT6732 and MT6737T, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6732 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6732 specs and review.

MT6737T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6737T specs and review.