Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek MT6732 vs Qualcomm 205 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek MT6732 vs Qualcomm 205

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6732 vs Qualcomm 205, comparison of GPUs Mali-T760 MP2 and Adreno 304.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6732 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Qualcomm 205 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, Quadrant, PCMark, Octane V2, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Fortnite, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy MT6732 or Qualcomm 205 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

 
MediaTek MT6732
Qualcomm 205

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MT67322% Qualcomm 2052%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MT673223% Qualcomm 20530%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MT67321% Qualcomm 2051%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MT6732 Qualcomm 205
Total score3376835062
CPU94459817
GPU1283213329
MEM54105612
UX60886311

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MT6732 Qualcomm 205
Single-Core8993
Multi-Core412428

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MT6732 Qualcomm 205
Frequency1500 MHz1100 MHz
Cores44
Bit6432
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A534x1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)7 W4 W
Memory typeLPDDR3 (Single Channel)LPDDR 2, LPDDR 3
Max. Memory4 Gb1 Gb
Memory Frequency800333
Memory bandwidth46
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache32 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache1 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6732 is 26% better than Qualcomm 205 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T760 MP2Adreno 304
GPU Frequency700 MHz400 MHz
GFloPS47.619.2
# of Cores2
# of Shader Units24
Display1280 x 720 pixels960 x 540 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile10.410.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)27.527.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra18.317.7
Call of Duty: Mobile16.614.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)22.623.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition34.335.6
Real Racing 322.922.1
Sniper 3D34.833.6
Need for Speed No Limits32.924.8
Mortal Kombat X26.525.7
CSR Racing 223.821.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP3 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem
Download speed300 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6732 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm 205 is better: 14
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips MT6732 and Qualcomm 205, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6732 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Qualcomm 205 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


MT6732 SoC Comparisons
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S


Qualcomm 205 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands