Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Spreadtrum SC5735 vs Spreadtrum SC9832A benchmark which processor is better

Spreadtrum SC5735 vs Spreadtrum SC9832A

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks Spreadtrum SC5735 vs Spreadtrum SC9832A, speed examination of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-400 MP2.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Spreadtrum SC5735 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Spreadtrum SC9832A is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Geekbench, Neocore, Octane V2, PassMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, and how good the CPUs are in games Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat etc.

   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Spreadtrum SC5735 or Spreadtrum SC9832A and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.


 
Spreadtrum SC5735
Spreadtrum SC9832A

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Spreadtrum SC57351% Spreadtrum SC9832A1%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Spreadtrum SC573524% Spreadtrum SC9832A32%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Spreadtrum SC57351% Spreadtrum SC9832A1%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Spreadtrum SC5735 Spreadtrum SC9832A
Total score1940823339
CPU54296527
GPU73838868
MEM31103735
UX34854211

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Spreadtrum SC5735 Spreadtrum SC9832A
Single-Core5162
Multi-Core237285

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Spreadtrum SC5735 Spreadtrum SC9832A
Frequency1200 MHz1300 MHz
Cores44
Bit3232
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A74x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2LPDDR2
Max. Memory1 Gb1 Gb
Memory Frequency266266
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache8 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Spreadtrum SC9832A is 7% better than Spreadtrum SC5735 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-400 MP2Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency400 MHz400 MHz
GFloPS8.48.4
# of Cores22
# of Shader Units
Display1280 x 800 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile5.14.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)15.216.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra9.110.5
Call of Duty: Mobile8.99.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)12.613.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition19.321.5
Real Racing 311.421
Sniper 3D17.313.7
Need for Speed No Limits14.616.8
Mortal Kombat X13.216.8
CSR Racing 211.814.7
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution8 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemTD-SCDMA/GGELTE Cat4
Upload speed50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC5735 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Spreadtrum SC9832A is better: 20
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Spreadtrum SC5735 and Spreadtrum SC9832A, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Spreadtrum SC5735 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Spreadtrum SC9832A SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Spreadtrum SC5735 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6572A
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs MediaTek MT6575


Spreadtrum SC9832A SoC Comparisons
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands