MediaTek MT6572 vs MediaTek MT6735P

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6572 vs MediaTek MT6735P, compare of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-400.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6572 is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6735P is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Vellamo, Geekbench, PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, and how good the chips are in games Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy MT6572 or MT6735P and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6572

MT6735P

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6572

22%

MT6735P

24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6572

MT6735P

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6572	MT6735P
Total score	13149	25064
CPU	3687	7020
GPU	4987	9527
MEM	2094	4009
UX	2366	4510

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6572	MT6735P
Single-Core	34	66
Multi-Core	160	306

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6572	MT6735P
Frequency	1200 MHz	1000 MHz
Cores	2	4
Bit	32	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	1 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	667
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6572 is 16% better than MT6735P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6572 has 2 more core than MT6735P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	4.5	13.6
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	960 x 540 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	3.1	6.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	9.9	19.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	5.7	11.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	4.8	11.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	7.8	15.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	12.1	24.3
Real Racing 3	7.1	14.9
Sniper 3D	12.5	26.2
Need for Speed No Limits	8	16.7
Mortal Kombat X	7.4	13.7
CSR Racing 2	6.8	15.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	5 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	HD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed		50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6572 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735P is better: 30
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6572 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• MT6572 specs and review.

MT6735P SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6735P specs and review.