MediaTek Kompanio 828 vs Samsung Exynos 2100

Comparisons 31-08-2022

Detailed comparison data of MediaTek Kompanio 828 vs Samsung Exynos 2100, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Vellamo, Geekbench, 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 828 or Exynos 2100.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Kompanio 828

33%

Exynos 2100

48%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Kompanio 828

77%

Exynos 2100

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Kompanio 828

30%

Exynos 2100

47%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Kompanio 828	Exynos 2100
Total score	461679	672647
CPU	129260	188336
GPU	175433	255602
MEM	73873	107633
UX	83100	121079

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Kompanio 828	Exynos 2100
Single-Core	704	1321
Multi-Core	2786	4216

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Kompanio 828	Exynos 2100
Frequency	2600 MHz	2910 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.91 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.81 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.21 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	24	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2100 is 10% better than MediaTek Kompanio 828 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MP5	Mali-G78 MP14
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	705.5	976
# of Cores	5	24
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.2	25.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	41.2	78.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	53.9	47.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	50.3	43.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	33.7	67.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	52.6	98.6
Real Racing 3	106.1	83
Sniper 3D	99.2	90.1
Need for Speed No Limits	74.3	75.8
Mortal Kombat X	85.8	54.5
CSR Racing 2	63.3	66.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	240 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1800 MBit/s.	12000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, QZSS L1CA+ L5	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 828 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2100 is better: 24
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Kompanio 828 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 828 specs and review.

Exynos 2100 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2100 specs and review.