Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 vs Samsung Exynos 2100 benchmark which processor is better

Snapdragon 875 vs Exynos 2100

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 vs Samsung Exynos 2100, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G78 MP14 and Adreno 660.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 875 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Exynos 2100 is octa-core (Cortex-X1). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, GFXBench, Octane V2, Vellamo, PCMark, and how good the processors are in games Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc.

After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 875 or Exynos 2100 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 875

64%

Exynos 2100

48%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 875

79%

Exynos 2100

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 875

61%

Exynos 2100

47%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 875	Exynos 2100
Total score	892580	672647
CPU	249924	188336
GPU	339178	255602
MEM	142802	107633
UX	160655	121079

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 875	Exynos 2100
Single-Core	1404	1321
Multi-Core	4904	4216

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 875	Exynos 2100
Frequency	2840 MHz	2910 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55	2x2.91 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.81 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.21 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2750	2133
Memory bandwidth	51.2	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	512 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2100 is 2% better than Snapdragon 875 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 660	Mali-G78 MP14
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	1486	976
# of Cores		24
# of Shader Units	512
Display	3840 x 2160 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	34.8	25.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	105.8	78.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	63.4	47.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	58.4	43.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	90.5	67.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	130.5	98.6
Real Racing 3	126.8	83
Sniper 3D	139.5	90.1
Need for Speed No Limits	88.8	75.8
Mortal Kombat X	91.9	54.5
CSR Racing 2	76.1	66.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	240 MP
Dual Camera resolution	36 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Qualcomm Spectra 480
Video Encoding FPS	60	120
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X57 Modem-RF System 5G	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	15000 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	6000 MBit/s.	12000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Beidou, NavIC enabled, SBAS, GPS, GNSS, Galileo, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2100 is better: 8
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Snapdragon 875 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 875 specs and review.

Exynos 2100 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2100 specs and review.