Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Kompanio 828 vs Apple A13 Bionic benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Kompanio 828 vs Apple A13 Bionic

Comparisons   31-08-2022
   Full comparison data of MediaTek Kompanio 828 vs Apple A13 Bionic, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as 3DMark, Quadrant, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PassMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 828 or A13 Bionic.

 
MediaTek Kompanio 828
Apple A13 Bionic

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MediaTek Kompanio 82833% A13 Bionic37%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MediaTek Kompanio 82877% A13 Bionic73%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MediaTek Kompanio 82830% A13 Bionic35%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MediaTek Kompanio 828 A13 Bionic
Total score461679521807
CPU129260146108
GPU175433198279
MEM7387383491
UX8310093922

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MediaTek Kompanio 828 A13 Bionic
Single-Core7041111
Multi-Core27863444

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MediaTek Kompanio 828 A13 Bionic
Frequency2600 MHz2660 MHz
Cores86
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm7 nm
Transistors count8500 millions
Core configuration4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
2x2.66 GHz Icestorm
4x1.6 GHz Firestorm
Power consumption (TDP)7 W6 W
Memory typeLPDDR4xLPDDR4X
Max. Memory16 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency21334266
Memory bandwidth24
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache48 KB
L2 cache4 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.4-AARMv8.3-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A13 Bionic is 2% better than MediaTek Kompanio 828 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MediaTek Kompanio 828 has -2 more core than A13 Bionic. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G57 MP5Apple A13 Bionic
GPU Frequency850 MHz2600 MHz
GFloPS705.5786
# of Cores54
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1440 pixels2688 x 1242 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile27.262.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)41.256.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra53.962.9
Call of Duty: Mobile50.362.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)33.750.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition52.676.4
Real Racing 3106.1125.8
Sniper 3D99.2138.4
Need for Speed No Limits74.388.1
Mortal Kombat X85.8100.6
CSR Racing 263.381.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution32 MP12 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP12 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Apple ISP
Video Encoding FPS240960
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCDolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9


Networks and Navigation
Modem5G Multi-ModeIntel XMM 7660 LTE
Download speed2770 MBit/s.1600 MBit/s.
Upload speed1800 MBit/s.225 MBit/s.
NavigationGlonass L1OF, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, QZSS L1CA+ L5GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou
NFC supportNoYes
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 828 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic is better: 29
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Kompanio 828 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
A13 Bionic SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10


MediaTek Kompanio 828 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus


A13 Bionic SoC Comparisons
• Vs Snapdragon 875
• Vs Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Dimensity 1000L
• Vs A14 Bionic
• Vs Snapdragon 865
• Vs Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Exynos 2100
• Vs A12X Bionic
• Vs Exynos 1080
• Vs Kirin 9000E
• Vs Kirin 9000
• Vs Snapdragon 888
• Vs A12Z Bionic
• Vs Exynos 990
• Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Kirin 990E
• Vs Dimensity 1000C
• Vs Kirin 985
• Vs A12 Bionic
• Vs Dimensity 820
• Vs Exynos 9 9820
• Vs Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Exynos 9825
• Vs Kirin 980
• Vs Snapdragon 768G
• Vs Dimensity 800
• Vs Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Dimensity 800U
• Vs Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Helio G95
• Vs Snapdragon 765G
• Vs Snapdragon 855
• Vs Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Helio G90
• Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Helio G90T
• Vs Tiger T710
• Vs Kirin 810
• Vs Tiger T7510
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm QCM5430
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands