|
MediaTek Kompanio 828 vs Samsung Exynos 9825 |
|
Comparisons 31-08-2022 Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Kompanio 828 vs Samsung Exynos 9825, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, PassMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 828 or Exynos 9825.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Kompanio 828 | 33% |
Exynos 9825 | 26% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Kompanio 828 | 77% |
Exynos 9825 | 72% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Kompanio 828 | 30% |
Exynos 9825 | 25% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Kompanio 828 |
Exynos 9825 | Total score | 461679 | 361112 | CPU | 129260 | 101103 | GPU | 175433 | 137221 | MEM | 73873 | 57779 | UX | 83100 | 65002 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Kompanio 828 |
Exynos 9825 | Single-Core | 704 | 778 | Multi-Core | 2786 | 2648 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Kompanio 828 |
Exynos 9825 | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 3300 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x3.4 GHz Exynos M3 Mongoose 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 31.1 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 512 KB | L2 cache | | 2 MB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9825 is 21% better than MediaTek Kompanio 828 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G76 MP12 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 705.5 | 489.38 | # of Cores | 5 | 12 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.2 | 28.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 41.2 | 55.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 53.9 | 45.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 50.3 | 37.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 33.7 | 46.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 52.6 | 71.3 | Real Racing 3 | 106.1 | 68.1 | Sniper 3D | 99.2 | 72.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 74.3 | 81.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 85.8 | 72.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 63.3 | 59 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 22 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Multi-Mode | LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 8CA | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 2024 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1800 MBit/s. | 316 MBit/s. | Navigation | Glonass L1OF, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 828 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9825 is better: 14 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MediaTek Kompanio 828 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
Exynos 9825 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
| |
|