Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, compare of GPUs Adreno 619L and Mali-G78 MP14.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 2100 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Snapdragon 690 5G is octa-core (Kryo 560). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like AnTuTu 8, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, PCMark, Geekbench, Octane V2, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock etc.

After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Exynos 2100 or Snapdragon 690 5G and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2100

48%

Snapdragon 690 5G

24%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2100

79%

Snapdragon 690 5G

74%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2100

47%

Snapdragon 690 5G

21%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2100	Snapdragon 690 5G
Total score	672647	339723
CPU	188336	95116
GPU	255602	129086
MEM	107633	54361
UX	121079	61145

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2100	Snapdragon 690 5G
Single-Core	1321	760
Multi-Core	4216	2587

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2100	Snapdragon 690 5G
Frequency	2910 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	8 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.91 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.81 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.21 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	8x2.0 GHz Kryo 560
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4x (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory	16 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	1866
Memory bandwidth	51.2	14.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2100 is 31% better than Snapdragon 690 5G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G78 MP14	Adreno 619L
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	975 MHz
GFloPS	976	486
# of Cores	24
# of Shader Units		316
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	25.3	24.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	78.7	55.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	47.4	45.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	43.6	41.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	67.7	45.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	98.6	71.4
Real Racing 3	83	80.3
Sniper 3D	90.1	59.7
Need for Speed No Limits	75.8	82.6
Mortal Kombat X	54.5	66.6
CSR Racing 2	66.4	59.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	240 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 355L
Video Encoding FPS	120	240
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Snapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF System
Download speed	14000 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	12000 MBit/s.	900 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass	GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS, GNSS
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2100 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G is better: 7
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Exynos 2100 and Snapdragon 690 5G, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 2100 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2100 specs and review.

Snapdragon 690 5G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 690 5G specs and review.