Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Apple A13 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2100 benchmark which processor is better

A13 Bionic vs Exynos 2100

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Apple A13 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2100, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G78 MP14 and Apple A13 Bionic.

   This performance comparison includes two processors: A13 Bionic is gexa-core (Icestorm) and Exynos 2100 is octa-core (Cortex-X1). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Vellamo, Geekbench 5, PassMark, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, Octane V2, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, even the gaming performance of processors in Sniper 3D, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy A13 Bionic or Exynos 2100 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

 
Apple A13 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 2100

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors

CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
A13 Bionic93% Exynos 210098%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
A13 Bionic79% Exynos 210095%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
A13 Bionic86% Exynos 210091%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
A13 Bionic Exynos 2100
Total score521807672647
CPU192430194890
GPU195007273522
MEM115777105982
UX9694798170

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
A13 Bionic Exynos 2100
Single-Core11111321
Multi-Core34444216

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
A13 Bionic Exynos 2100
Frequency2660 MHz2910 MHz
Cores68
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm5 nm
Transistors count8500 millions
Core configuration2x2.66 GHz Icestorm
4x1.6 GHz Firestorm
2x2.91 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.81 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.21 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)6 W9 W
Memory typeLPDDR4XLPDDR5
Max. Memory16 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency42662133
Memory bandwidth51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache48 KB
L2 cache4 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.3-AARMv8.4-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2100 is 8% better than A13 Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A13 Bionic has 2 more core than Exynos 2100. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUApple A13 BionicMali-G78 MP14
GPU Frequency2600 MHz700 MHz
GFloPS786976
# of Cores424
# of Shader Units
Display2688 x 1242 pixels4096 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile62.625.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)56.578.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra62.947.4
Call of Duty: Mobile62.143.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)50.767.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition76.498.6
Real Racing 3125.883
Sniper 3D138.490.1
Need for Speed No Limits88.175.8
Mortal Kombat X100.654.5
CSR Racing 281.866.4
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution12 MP240 MP
Dual Camera resolution12 MP48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Apple ISP
Video Encoding FPS960120
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportDolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9


Networks and Navigation
ModemIntel XMM 7660 LTEExynos Modem 5200
Download speed1600 MBit/s.14000 MBit/s.
Upload speed225 MBit/s.12000 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeidouQZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportNoYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2100 is better: 24
   You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8


CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Snapdragon 875 Vs A13 Bionic
• Vs A12Z Bionic
• Vs Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Kirin 9000
• Vs Kirin 9000E
• Vs Exynos 1080
• Vs A12X Bionic
• Vs Snapdragon 865 Plus

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile


CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Exynos 2100
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
Categories
 • Comparisons
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands
Last added

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 5800X..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-9940X..
Core i9-11900H vs Core i7-11700K..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 47..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 5 5600H..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 Extrem..
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 9 5980HS..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-11900..
Core i9-11980HK vs Core i9-7980X..
Intel Core i9-11900KB Cinebench r23
Core i9-11950H vs Xeon Gold 6248..
Intel Core i9-10900E Cinebench r15
Core i9-10900E vs Core i5-11500T..
Core i9-11980HK vs Ryzen 9 5900..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-11900..
Intel Core i9-11950H GeekBench 5
Core i9-11980HK vs Core i7-11700..
Core i9-10900E vs Core i7-9800X..
Core i9-10900TE vs Xeon E5-2697R..
Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon W-2275..
Intel Core i9-11900KB GeekBench 5
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Intel Core i9-10900E GeekBench 5
Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-11900F..
Intel Core i9-11900H Cinebench r20
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 2700..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 5700G..
Core i9-11900H vs Core i9-11900F..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-10920..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-10980..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen 7 5800X..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-10900TE vs Core i7-10700..
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 4600H..
Core i9-10900E vs Core i9-10885H..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen 7 Pro 58..
Core i9-10900TE vs Core i9-10885..