Comparisons 20-05-2022
Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Samsung Exynos 2100, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Vellamo, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, Neocore, 3DMark, Geekbench, PassMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 1300 or Exynos 2100.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 96% |
Exynos 2100 | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 88% |
Exynos 2100 | 95% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 92% |
Exynos 2100 | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
Exynos 2100 | | Total score | 801200 | 672647 | | CPU | 163368 | 194890 | | GPU | 139627 | 273522 | | MEM | 106600 | 105982 | | UX | 93142 | 98170 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
Exynos 2100 | | Single-Core | 1455 | 1321 | | Multi-Core | 4766 | 4216 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
Exynos 2100 | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2910 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 5800 millions | | | Core configuration | 2x3.0GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.91 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.81 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.21 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 32 | 51.2 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 32 KB | | | L2 cache | 320 KB | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is 3% better than Exynos 2100 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G78 MP14 | | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 504 | 976 | | # of Cores | 9 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 25.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 78.7 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 47.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 43.6 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 67.7 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 98.6 | | Real Racing 3 | | 83 | | Sniper 3D | | 90.1 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 75.8 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 54.5 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 66.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2100 is better: 27
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Exynos 2100
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
|
