Comparisons 01-06-2021
Detailed testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs Samsung Exynos 2100, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like 3DMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, PCMark, Neocore, Vellamo, AnTuTu, GFXBench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 780G or Exynos 2100.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 780G | 97% |
Exynos 2100 | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 780G | 99% |
Exynos 2100 | 95% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 780G | 90% |
Exynos 2100 | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 780G |
Exynos 2100 | | Total score | 718020 | 672647 | | CPU | 91177 | 194890 | | GPU | 113501 | 273522 | | MEM | 52158 | 105982 | | UX | 47521 | 98170 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 780G |
Exynos 2100 | | Single-Core | 1608 | 1321 | | Multi-Core | 5467 | 4216 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 780G |
Exynos 2100 | | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2910 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x2.91 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.81 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.21 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4666 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 17 | 51.2 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2100 is 17% better than Snapdragon 780G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali-G78 MP14 | | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 986 | 976 | | # of Cores | | 24 | | # of Shader Units | 384 | | | Display | 3360 x 1600 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 25.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 78.7 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 47.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 43.6 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 67.7 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 98.6 | | Real Racing 3 | | 83 | | Sniper 3D | | 90.1 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 75.8 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 54.5 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 66.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 192 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2100 is better: 25
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Exynos 2100
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Samsung Exynos 2000 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
|
