Comparisons 26-08-2021
Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs Samsung Exynos 2100, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 860 or Exynos 2100.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 860 | 74% |
Exynos 2100 | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 860 | 82% |
Exynos 2100 | 95% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 860 | 72% |
Exynos 2100 | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 860 |
Exynos 2100 | | Total score | 441828 | 672647 | | CPU | 100501 | 194890 | | GPU | 125460 | 273522 | | MEM | 57676 | 105982 | | UX | 52377 | 98170 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 860 |
Exynos 2100 | | Single-Core | 768 | 1321 | | Multi-Core | 2765 | 4216 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 860 |
Exynos 2100 | | Frequency | 2960 MHz | 2910 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Prime
3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485 Silver | 2x2.91 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.81 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.21 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 | 51.2 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 860 is 1% better than Exynos 2100 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali-G78 MP14 | | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 986 | 976 | | # of Cores | | 24 | | # of Shader Units | 384 | | | Display | 2840 x 2160 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 25.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 78.7 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 47.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 43.6 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 67.7 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 98.6 | | Real Racing 3 | | 83 | | Sniper 3D | | 90.1 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 75.8 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 54.5 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 66.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 192 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 22 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 380 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X24 LTE modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 2048 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 316 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Beidou, SBAS, GLONASS, Galileo, GNSS, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, QZSS | QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2100 is better: 30
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Exynos 2100
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
|
