Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Helio G95

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Helio G95, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 and Mali-G78 MP14.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 2100 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Helio G95 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Vellamo, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, Neocore, Octane V2, PCMark, AnTuTu 8, PassMark, 3DMark, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Exynos 2100 or Helio G95 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2100

48%

Helio G95

22%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2100

79%

Helio G95

66%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2100

47%

Helio G95

19%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2100	Helio G95
Total score	672647	308396
CPU	188336	86348
GPU	255602	117182
MEM	107633	49333
UX	121079	55511

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2100	Helio G95
Single-Core	1321	690
Multi-Core	4216	2348

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2100	Helio G95
Frequency	2910 MHz	2050 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.91 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.81 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.21 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.05 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	10 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	51.2
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2100 is 29% better than Helio G95 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G78 MP14	Mali-G76 3EEMC4
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	976	279
# of Cores	24	4
# of Shader Units
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	25.3	29.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	78.7	53.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	47.4	47.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	43.6	40.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	67.7	44.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	98.6	65.9
Real Racing 3	83	94.6
Sniper 3D	90.1	104.1
Need for Speed No Limits	75.8	56.8
Mortal Kombat X	54.5	54.4
CSR Racing 2	66.4	52

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	240 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	24 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	120	240
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	4G LTE WorldMode modem
Download speed	14000 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	12000 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS, NaVIC, Beidou, SBAS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2100 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G95 is better: 6
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Exynos 2100 and Helio G95, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 2100 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2100 specs and review.

Helio G95 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Helio G95 specs and review.