MediaTek Kompanio 828 vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380

Comparisons 31-08-2022

Full comparison data of MediaTek Kompanio 828 vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 828 or MediaTek Kompanio 1380.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Kompanio 828

33%

MediaTek Kompanio 1380

46%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Kompanio 828

77%

MediaTek Kompanio 1380

80%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Kompanio 828

30%

MediaTek Kompanio 1380

45%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Kompanio 828	MediaTek Kompanio 1380
Total score	461679	645918
CPU	129260	180858
GPU	175433	245447
MEM	73873	103349
UX	83100	116272

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Kompanio 828	MediaTek Kompanio 1380
Single-Core	704	1217
Multi-Core	2786	3486

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Kompanio 828	MediaTek Kompanio 1380
Frequency	2600 MHz	3000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Transistors count		6200 millions
Core configuration	4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	24	32
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		32 KB
L2 cache		320 KB
L3 cache		8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Kompanio 1380 is 13% better than MediaTek Kompanio 828 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MP5	Mali-G57 MC5
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	705.5	630.15
# of Cores	5	5
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.2	30.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	41.2	73.2
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	53.9	101.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	50.3	56.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	33.7	62.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	52.6	92.4
Real Racing 3	106.1	126.4
Sniper 3D	99.2	161.1
Need for Speed No Limits	74.3	141.1
Mortal Kombat X	85.8	116.7
CSR Racing 2	63.3	141.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1800 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, QZSS L1CA+ L5	BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, NavIC
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 828 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 1380 is better: 32
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Kompanio 828 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 828 specs and review.

MediaTek Kompanio 1380 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 1380 specs and review.