MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, compare of GPUs Mali-G57 MC1 and Adreno 620.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Dimensity 600 5G is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Snapdragon 765G is octa-core (Kryo 475 Prime). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, 3DMark, AnTuTu 8, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, and how good the chipsets are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 600 5G or Snapdragon 765G and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 600 5G

15%

Snapdragon 765G

21%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 600 5G

76%

Snapdragon 765G

74%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 600 5G

13%

Snapdragon 765G

19%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 600 5G	Snapdragon 765G
Total score	215034	304160
CPU	60204	85154
GPU	81704	115588
MEM	34403	48671
UX	38700	54738

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 600 5G	Snapdragon 765G
Single-Core	443	681
Multi-Core	1774	2316

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 600 5G	Snapdragon 765G
Frequency	2000 MHz	2400 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	12 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	13	17
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	320 KB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.3-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 765G is 16% better than Dimensity 600 5G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC1	Adreno 620
GPU Frequency	900 MHz	750 MHz
GFloPS		896
# of Cores
# of Shader Units		384
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	20.8	31.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	40.5	55.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	46.4	62.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	36.1	40.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	35.8	51.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	50.1	75.6
Real Racing 3	69.6	93.8
Sniper 3D	74.2	137.5
Need for Speed No Limits	55.7	112.5
Mortal Kombat X	67.3	100
CSR Racing 2	51	75

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	22 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 355
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Qualcomm Snapdragon X52 Modem-RF System
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	3700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	500 MBit/s.	1600 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G is better: 28
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Dimensity 600 5G and Snapdragon 765G, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Dimensity 600 5G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 600 5G specs and review.

Snapdragon 765G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 765G specs and review.