|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G |
|
Comparisons 01-08-2021 Detailed testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like 3DMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx or Dimensity 600 5G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 8cx | 25% |
Dimensity 600 5G | 15% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 8cx | 73% |
Dimensity 600 5G | 76% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 8cx | 23% |
Dimensity 600 5G | 13% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 8cx |
Dimensity 600 5G | Total score | 358168 | 215034 | CPU | 100295 | 60204 | GPU | 136104 | 81704 | MEM | 57306 | 34403 | UX | 64475 | 38700 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 8cx |
Dimensity 600 5G | Single-Core | 748 | 443 | Multi-Core | 2837 | 1774 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 8cx |
Dimensity 600 5G | Frequency | 2840 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.84 GHz Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 68 | 13 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 384 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 768 KB | 320 KB | L3 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 8cx is 29% better than Dimensity 600 5G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 680 | Mali-G57 MC1 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 900 MHz | GFloPS | 712 | | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.3 | 20.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 55.4 | 40.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 45.6 | 46.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 37.4 | 36.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 45.6 | 35.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 70.6 | 50.1 | Real Racing 3 | 67.3 | 69.6 | Sniper 3D | 72.2 | 74.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 81.5 | 55.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 72.4 | 67.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 58.4 | 51 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 390 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X24 LTE modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 2770 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx is better: 29
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G is better: 7 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 8cx SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
Dimensity 600 5G SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
| |
|