MediaTek Dimensity 1000C vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 1000C vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G57 MP5 and Mali-G57 MC1.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Dimensity 1000C is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77) and Dimensity 600 5G is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, Neocore, 3DMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of processors in Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock etc.

After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy Dimensity 1000C or Dimensity 600 5G and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 1000C

31%

Dimensity 600 5G

15%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 1000C

76%

Dimensity 600 5G

76%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 1000C

29%

Dimensity 600 5G

13%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 1000C	Dimensity 600 5G
Total score	430976	215034
CPU	120673	60204
GPU	163767	81704
MEM	68953	34403
UX	77577	38700

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 1000C	Dimensity 600 5G
Single-Core	923	443
Multi-Core	3047	1774

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 1000C	Dimensity 600 5G
Frequency	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	2133
Memory bandwidth	29.87	13
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		32 KB
L2 cache		320 KB
L3 cache		1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.3-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MP5	Mali-G57 MC1
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	705.5
# of Cores	5
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.1	20.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	55.6	40.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	57.3	46.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	41.8	36.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	46.9	35.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	76.6	50.1
Real Racing 3	86	69.6
Sniper 3D	74.5	74.2
Need for Speed No Limits	68.8	55.7
Mortal Kombat X	83.1	67.3
CSR Racing 2	63	51

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	64 MP	32 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	4600 MBit/s.	2770 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	500 MBit/s.
Navigation	BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF	Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1000C is better: 27
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Dimensity 1000C and Dimensity 600 5G, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Dimensity 1000C SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 1000C specs and review.

Dimensity 600 5G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 600 5G specs and review.