Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9610 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9610

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9610, comparison of GPUs Mali-G57 MC1 and Mali-G72 MP3.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Dimensity 600 5G is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Exynos 9610 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like PCMark, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, GFXBench, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, PUBG etc.

   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chipset is better to buy Dimensity 600 5G or Exynos 9610 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.


 
MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
Samsung Exynos 9610

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Dimensity 600 5G15% Exynos 961011%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Dimensity 600 5G76% Exynos 961068%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Dimensity 600 5G13% Exynos 961010%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Dimensity 600 5G Exynos 9610
Total score215034160114
CPU6020444826
GPU8170460836
MEM3440325613
UX3870028823

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Dimensity 600 5G Exynos 9610
Single-Core443444
Multi-Core17741378

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Dimensity 600 5G Exynos 9610
Frequency2000 MHz2300 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A73
4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)5 W8 W
Memory typeLPDDR4xLPDDR4
Max. Memory12 Gb6 Gb
Memory Frequency21331866
Memory bandwidth1311.92
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache32 KB
L2 cache320 KB
L3 cache1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9610 is 13% better than Dimensity 600 5G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G57 MC1Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency900 MHz700 MHz
GFloPS161
# of Cores3
# of Shader Units
Display2520 x 1080 pixels2560 x 1600 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile20.819.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)40.523.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra46.452.1
Call of Duty: Mobile36.126.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)35.820.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition50.129.9
Real Racing 369.691.2
Sniper 3D74.299
Need for Speed No Limits55.772.9
Mortal Kombat X67.375.5
CSR Racing 25157.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution32 MP24 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS240120
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9


Networks and Navigation
Modem5G Multi-ModeLTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA
Download speed2770 MBit/s.600 MBit/s.
Upload speed500 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGalileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavICGPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9610 is better: 12
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Dimensity 600 5G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Exynos 9610 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Dimensity 600 5G SoC Comparisons
• Vs Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200


Exynos 9610 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands