MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G vs MediaTek Helio G85

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G vs MediaTek Helio G85, compare of GPUs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 and Mali-G57 MC1.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Dimensity 600 5G is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Helio G85 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, Vellamo, Octane V2, PassMark, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Dimensity 600 5G or Helio G85 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 600 5G

15%

Helio G85

16%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 600 5G

76%

Helio G85

66%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 600 5G

13%

Helio G85

15%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 600 5G	Helio G85
Total score	215034	231669
CPU	60204	64870
GPU	81704	88037
MEM	34403	37059
UX	38700	41700

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 600 5G	Helio G85
Single-Core	443	477
Multi-Core	1774	1911

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 600 5G	Helio G85
Frequency	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	12 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	1800
Memory bandwidth	13	13.41
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	320 KB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC1	Mali-G52 2EEMC2
GPU Frequency	900 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS		468.05
# of Cores		2
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	20.8	22.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	40.5	44.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	46.4	50.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	36.1	39.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	35.8	38.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	50.1	54.6
Real Racing 3	69.6	87.7
Sniper 3D	74.2	110.2
Need for Speed No Limits	55.7	90.2
Mortal Kombat X	67.3	72.6
CSR Racing 2	51	60.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	48 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	4G LTE WorldMode modem
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	500 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G is better: 11
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G85 is better: 23
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Dimensity 600 5G and Helio G85, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Dimensity 600 5G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 600 5G specs and review.

Helio G85 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Helio G85 specs and review.