|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus |
|
Comparisons 29-10-2024 Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of chips in Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra or Dimensity 9200 Plus.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra | 34% |
Dimensity 9200 Plus | 99% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra | 89% |
Dimensity 9200 Plus | 86% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra | 33% |
Dimensity 9200 Plus | 97% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra |
Dimensity 9200 Plus | Total score | 755955 | 1384198 | CPU | 211667 | 387571 | GPU | 287263 | 526003 | MEM | 120958 | 221468 | UX | 136072 | 249146 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra |
Dimensity 9200 Plus | Single-Core | 1112 | 1583 | Multi-Core | 3904 | 5754 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra |
Dimensity 9200 Plus | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 3350 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 6200 millions | 9200 millions | Core configuration | 4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.35 GHz ARM Cortex-X3 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x | LPDDR5x | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 8553 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 64 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 32 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 9200 Plus is 25% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Immortalis-G715 MC16 | GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 1856 | 3200 | # of Cores | 6 | 16 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 29.1 | 52.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 89.7 | 164.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 53.8 | 98.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 50.1 | 91.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 77.7 | 140.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 111.6 | 201.9 | Real Racing 3 | 108.1 | 197.4 | Sniper 3D | 118.2 | 215.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 75.1 | 137.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 79.3 | 142.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 65.9 | 118.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 320 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 3270 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2250 MBit/s. | 3100 MBit/s. | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF | Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra is better: 2
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus is better: 32 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Dimensity 9200 Plus SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|