MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

Comparisons   29-10-2024
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, PassMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2 etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra or MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

34%

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

51%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

89%

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

86%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra

33%

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

49%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Total score	755955	719546
CPU	211667	201463
GPU	287263	273436
MEM	120958	115118
UX	136072	129523

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Single-Core	1112	1059
Multi-Core	3904	3716

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Frequency	2500 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions	6200 millions
Core configuration	4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	6400
Memory bandwidth	48	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra is 12% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency	1100 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	1856	912
# of Cores	6	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.1	28.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	89.7	85.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	53.8	51.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	50.1	47.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	77.7	73.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	111.6	106.8
Real Racing 3	108.1	103.1
Sniper 3D	118.2	113.5
Need for Speed No Limits	75.1	62.6
Mortal Kombat X	79.3	82.1
CSR Racing 2	65.9	67.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	3270 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2250 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra is better: 20
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra specs and review.