MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Unisoc Tiger T820

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Unisoc Tiger T820, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, PassMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2 etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 6300 or Tiger T820.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 6300

20%

Tiger T820

34%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 6300

86%

Tiger T820

81%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 6300

18%

Tiger T820

33%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 6300	Tiger T820
Total score	447637	480533
CPU	125333	134552
GPU	170107	182597
MEM	71614	76880
UX	80574	86490

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 6300	Tiger T820
Single-Core	904	702
Multi-Core	2205	2896

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 6300	Tiger T820
Frequency	2400 MHz	2700 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	6 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4/4x/4y
Max. Memory	12 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	17.07	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		256 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tiger T820 is 11% better than MediaTek Dimensity 6300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G57 MP6
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	486	846
# of Cores	2	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2160 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.9	28.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	56.4	42.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	58.4	55.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	42.7	52.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	49.3	34.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	75.7	54.9
Real Racing 3	73.2	110.5
Sniper 3D	128.8	104.5
Need for Speed No Limits	81.9	77.5
Mortal Kombat X	84.6	88.4
CSR Racing 2	64.4	65.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	108 MP	108 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Vivi Magic 6.0
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	3GPP R16 5G Multi-Mode	Ivy V510 5G
Download speed	3300 MBit/s.	3500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	NavIC, Galileo E1+E5a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+B2a, QZSS L1CA+L5	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	No	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 6300 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T820 is better: 25
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 6300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 6300 specs and review.

Tiger T820 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T820 specs and review.