MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Geekbench, PassMark, PCMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, GFXBench, Quadrant, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty etc.
   After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 6300 or MediaTek Kompanio 800T.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 6300

20%

MediaTek Kompanio 800T

31%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 6300

86%

MediaTek Kompanio 800T

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 6300

18%

MediaTek Kompanio 800T

28%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 6300	MediaTek Kompanio 800T
Total score	447637	431476
CPU	125333	120813
GPU	170107	163965
MEM	71614	69046
UX	80574	77673

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 6300	MediaTek Kompanio 800T
Single-Core	904	923
Multi-Core	2205	3052

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 6300	MediaTek Kompanio 800T
Frequency	2400 MHz	2400 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	12 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	17.07	24
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G57 MC2
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	486	486
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.9	28.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	56.4	55.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	58.4	58.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	42.7	42.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	49.3	47.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	75.7	77.3
Real Racing 3	73.2	102.1
Sniper 3D	128.8	110.1
Need for Speed No Limits	81.9	93.9
Mortal Kombat X	84.6	67.7
CSR Racing 2	64.4	64.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	108 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	3GPP R16 5G Multi-Mode	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	3300 MBit/s.	2770 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1500 MBit/s.	1800 MBit/s.
Navigation	NavIC, Galileo E1+E5a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+B2a, QZSS L1CA+L5	GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC
NFC support	No	No
5G support	No	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 6300 is better: 14
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 800T is better: 12
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 6300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 6300 specs and review.

MediaTek Kompanio 800T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 800T specs and review.