|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 |
|
Comparisons 28-10-2024 Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, and how good the CPUs are in games Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 6300 or Dimensity 800.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 6300 | 20% |
Dimensity 800 | 24% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | 86% |
Dimensity 800 | 76% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 6300 | 18% |
Dimensity 800 | 22% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
Dimensity 800 | Total score | 447637 | 339816 | CPU | 125333 | 95148 | GPU | 170107 | 129130 | MEM | 71614 | 54368 | UX | 80574 | 61166 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
Dimensity 800 | Single-Core | 904 | 761 | Multi-Core | 2205 | 2588 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
Dimensity 800 | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 12 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 17.07 | 17.07 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 6300 is 16% better than Dimensity 800 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP4 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 498 | # of Cores | 2 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.9 | 25.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 56.4 | 56.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 58.4 | 46.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 42.7 | 42.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 49.3 | 46.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 75.7 | 72.2 | Real Racing 3 | 73.2 | 69.3 | Sniper 3D | 128.8 | 101.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 81.9 | 73.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 84.6 | 67 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.4 | 64.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 108 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 32 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | 3GPP R16 5G Multi-Mode | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 3300 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | NavIC, Galileo E1+E5a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+B2a, QZSS L1CA+L5 | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 6300 is better: 21
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 800 is better: 9 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Dimensity 800 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
| |
|