|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 |
|
Comparisons 28-10-2024 Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AnTuTu, Geekbench, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 6300 or Dimensity 8300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 6300 | 20% |
Dimensity 8300 | 74% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | 86% |
Dimensity 8300 | 87% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 6300 | 18% |
Dimensity 8300 | 72% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
Dimensity 8300 | Total score | 447637 | 1035505 | CPU | 125333 | 289949 | GPU | 170107 | 393482 | MEM | 71614 | 165670 | UX | 80574 | 186390 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
Dimensity 8300 | Single-Core | 904 | 1184 | Multi-Core | 2205 | 4305 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
Dimensity 8300 | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | | 8800 millions | Core configuration | 2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X3 3x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A714 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5x | Max. Memory | 12 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 7500 | Memory bandwidth | 17.07 | 52 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 1 MB | L2 cache | | 8 MB | L3 cache | | 32 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8300 is 14% better than MediaTek Dimensity 6300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 426 | # of Cores | 2 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.9 | 39.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 56.4 | 122.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 58.4 | 73.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 42.7 | 67.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 49.3 | 104.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 75.7 | 151.2 | Real Racing 3 | 73.2 | 147.5 | Sniper 3D | 128.8 | 162.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 81.9 | 102.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 84.6 | 105.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.4 | 88.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 108 MP | 320 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and NavigationModem | 3GPP R16 5G Multi-Mode | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 3300 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | NavIC, Galileo E1+E5a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+B2a, QZSS L1CA+L5 | NavIC, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 6300 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8300 is better: 38 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Dimensity 8300 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|