MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like PassMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, AnTuTu, PCMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 6300 or Dimensity 8050.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 6300

20%

Dimensity 8050

54%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 6300

86%

Dimensity 8050

82%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 6300

18%

Dimensity 8050

52%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 6300	Dimensity 8050
Total score	447637	760798
CPU	125333	213023
GPU	170107	289096
MEM	71614	121725
UX	80574	136943

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 6300	Dimensity 8050
Single-Core	904	1219
Multi-Core	2205	4243

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 6300	Dimensity 8050
Frequency	2400 MHz	3000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	6 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	12 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	4266
Memory bandwidth	17.07	24
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8050 is 19% better than MediaTek Dimensity 6300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G77 MC9
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	486	504
# of Cores	2	9
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.9	30.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	56.4	90.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	58.4	53.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	42.7	50.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	49.3	77.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	75.7	111.9
Real Racing 3	73.2	108.7
Sniper 3D	128.8	119.1
Need for Speed No Limits	81.9	75.8
Mortal Kombat X	84.6	79.9
CSR Racing 2	64.4	65.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	108 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	3GPP R16 5G Multi-Mode	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	3300 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	NavIC, Galileo E1+E5a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+B2a, QZSS L1CA+L5	Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a
NFC support	No	No
5G support	No	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 6300 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8050 is better: 27
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 6300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 6300 specs and review.

Dimensity 8050 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 8050 specs and review.