|
Adreno 200 at 133 MHz vs Mali-400 at 400 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-01-2021 Full comparison data of Adreno 200 @ 133MHz vs Mali-400 @ 400MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, and how good the GPU are in games Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA etc. After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Adreno 200 or Mali-400.
Adreno 200 @ 133MHz vs Mali-400 @ 400MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Adreno 200 @ 133MHz |
Mali-400 @ 400MHz |
Frequency | 133 MHz | 400 MHz | Cores | 0 | 1 | Shaders | 8 | 0 | Lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm | Antutu v10 | 16285 | 13643 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 305 | 613 | | | | GFloPS | 2.1 GFloPS | 3.6 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 22 MT/s | 44 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 0.133 GP/s | 0.38 GP/s | DirectX | 11 | | Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 200 @ 133MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Mali-400 @ 400MHz is better: 7
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
| |
|