|
Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y vs AMD EPYC 73F3 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y vs AMD EPYC 73F3 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Prime95, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Gears 5, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, Blender, Handbrake, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Furmark, 7zip, UserBenchmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 73F3 or Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Xeon Silver 4410Y | 58% |
EPYC 73F3 | 62% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 73F3 is 6% better than Xeon Silver 4410Y. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Xeon Silver 4410Y | 65% |
EPYC 73F3 | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 114.4 | 109.5 | Valorant | 130.0 | 124.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.8 | 69.7 | Apex Legends | 122.2 | 116.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 97.5 | 93.3 | Overwatch | 105.3 | 100.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 89.7 | 85.8 | DOOM Eternal | 65.0 | 62.2 | Warzone | 101.4 | 97.0 | Assassin's Creed | 109.2 | 104.5 | Valheim | 107.9 | 103.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Xeon Silver 4410Y | 31% |
EPYC 73F3 | 15% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4410Y is more energy efficient than the EPYC 73F3 as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 240W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 542 | 125 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2515 | 5148 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1292 | 234 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5597 | 10911 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3170 | 577 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14035 | 28372 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | Single-Core | 415 | 1297 | Multi-Core | 27475 | 41617 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | Single-Core | 1397 | 1147 | Multi-Core | 25909 | 21059 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | Announcement date | March 17, 2023 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 12 | 16 | Threads | 24 | 32 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 38000 millions | 54000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 240 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | 100-000000321 100-100000321WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 73F3 is 42% better than Xeon Silver 4410Y in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 73F3 has 4 more core than Xeon Silver 4410Y. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 73F3 is better: 12 Although it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y and AMD EPYC 73F3 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 73F3 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|