 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y vs AMD EPYC 9474F |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y vs AMD EPYC 9474F and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, programming, rendering, streaming. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, 3DMark, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Furmark, Gears 5, PCMark 10, Prime95, RealBench, Blender, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9474F or Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Silver 4410Y | 58% |
EPYC 9474F | 77% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9474F is 24% better than Xeon Silver 4410Y. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Silver 4410Y | 65% |
EPYC 9474F | 85% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Control, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 114.4 | 150.1 | | Valorant | 130.0 | 170.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.8 | 95.5 | | Apex Legends | 122.2 | 160.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 97.5 | 127.9 | | Overwatch | 105.3 | 138.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 89.7 | 117.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 65.0 | 85.3 | | Warzone | 101.4 | 133.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 109.2 | 143.3 | | Valheim | 107.9 | 141.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Silver 4410Y | 31% |
EPYC 9474F | 16% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4410Y is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9474F as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 9474F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 542 | 246 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2515 | 11139 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1292 | 484 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5597 | 23633 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3170 | 1229 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14035 | 61496 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 9474F | | Single-Core | 415 | 2790 | | Multi-Core | 27475 | 90217 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 9474F | | Single-Core | 1397 | 1762 | | Multi-Core | 25909 | 60869 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 9474F | | Announcement date | March 17, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 12 | 48 | | Threads | 24 | 96 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 38000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 360 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000788
100-000000788WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9474F is 44% better than Xeon Silver 4410Y in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9474F has 36 more core than Xeon Silver 4410Y. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y is better: 7
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9474F is better: 26
However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y and AMD EPYC 9474F before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9474F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
