 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y vs AMD EPYC 9554 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-04-2023
If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y vs AMD EPYC 9554 and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, video editing, programming, streaming. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Blender, 7zip, Gears 5, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, PCMark 10, Prime95, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, RealBench, WPrime, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, PassMark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9554 or Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Silver 4410Y | 58% |
EPYC 9554 | 87% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9554 is 33% better than Xeon Silver 4410Y. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Silver 4410Y | 65% |
EPYC 9554 | 88% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 114.4 | 155.8 | | Valorant | 130.0 | 177.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.8 | 99.2 | | Apex Legends | 122.2 | 166.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 97.5 | 132.8 | | Overwatch | 105.3 | 143.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 89.7 | 122.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 65.0 | 88.5 | | Warzone | 101.4 | 138.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 109.2 | 148.7 | | Valheim | 107.9 | 147.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Silver 4410Y | 31% |
EPYC 9554 | 14% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Silver 4410Y is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9554 as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 9554 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 542 | 380 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2515 | 15365 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1292 | 708 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5597 | 32559 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3170 | 1726 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14035 | 84655 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 9554 | | Single-Core | 415 | 3630 | | Multi-Core | 27475 | 124178 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 9554 | | Single-Core | 1397 | 1560 | | Multi-Core | 25909 | 66486 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y |
AMD EPYC 9554 | | Announcement date | March 17, 2023 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP5 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Genoa | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.75 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 12 | 64 | | Threads | 24 | 128 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 38000 millions | 108000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 360 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000790
100-100000790WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9554 is 35% better than Xeon Silver 4410Y in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9554 has 52 more core than Xeon Silver 4410Y. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y is better: 9
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9554 is better: 25
Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y and AMD EPYC 9554 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9554 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
