 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 vs AMD EPYC 7252 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Xeon Gold 6434 vs AMD EPYC 7252 and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, 7zip, PassMark, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, WPrime, Handbrake, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Furmark, Blender.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7252 or Intel Xeon Gold 6434.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 6434 | 62% |
EPYC 7252 | 55% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Gold 6434 is 11% better than EPYC 7252. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 6434 | 64% |
EPYC 7252 | 58% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 112.8 | 103.4 | | Valorant | 128.2 | 117.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.8 | 65.8 | | Apex Legends | 120.5 | 110.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.1 | 88.1 | | Overwatch | 103.8 | 95.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.5 | 81.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.1 | 58.7 | | Warzone | 100.0 | 91.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 107.7 | 98.7 | | Valheim | 106.4 | 97.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 6434 | 27% |
EPYC 7252 | 27% |
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
AMD EPYC 7252 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 885 | 242 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2858 | 1856 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1964 | 433 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7051 | 4126 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1368 | 1482 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40142 | 11071 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
AMD EPYC 7252 | | Single-Core | 12464 | 1615 | | Multi-Core | 40862 | 19724 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
AMD EPYC 7252 | | Single-Core | 1607 | 1001 | | Multi-Core | 24327 | 15066 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
AMD EPYC 7252 | | Announcement date | March 12, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 42000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 195 W | 120 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 85 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 64MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000080
100-100000080WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434 is 16% better than EPYC 7252 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7252 is better: 6
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Gold 6434 and AMD EPYC 7252 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7252 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
