 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 vs AMD EPYC 7232P |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Xeon Gold 6434 vs AMD EPYC 7232P tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, video editing, streaming, programming. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Prime95, RealBench, Blender, PCMark 10, Blender, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, WPrime, 7zip, Handbrake, SuperPi, Furmark, MATLAB, PassMark, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7232P or Intel Xeon Gold 6434.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Gold 6434 | 62% |
EPYC 7232P | 55% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Gold 6434 is 11% better than EPYC 7232P. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Gold 6434 | 64% |
EPYC 7232P | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Control, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 112.8 | 96.8 | | Valorant | 128.2 | 110.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.8 | 61.6 | | Apex Legends | 120.5 | 103.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.1 | 82.5 | | Overwatch | 103.8 | 89.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.5 | 75.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.1 | 55.0 | | Warzone | 100.0 | 85.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 107.7 | 92.4 | | Valheim | 106.4 | 91.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Gold 6434 | 27% |
EPYC 7232P | 26% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6434 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7232P as it consumes less power: 195W vs. 120W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
AMD EPYC 7232P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 885 | 211 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2858 | 1570 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1964 | 372 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7051 | 3480 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1368 | 1255 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40142 | 9326 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
AMD EPYC 7232P | | Single-Core | 12464 | 1367 | | Multi-Core | 40862 | 16608 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
AMD EPYC 7232P | | Single-Core | 1607 | 965 | | Multi-Core | 24327 | 8637 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
AMD EPYC 7232P | | Announcement date | March 12, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 42000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 195 W | 120 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 85 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 32MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | 100-000000081
100-100000081WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434 is 16% better than EPYC 7232P in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7232P is better: 5
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Xeon Gold 6434 and AMD EPYC 7232P before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7232P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
