 |
AMD EPYC 7573X vs Intel Xeon Gold 6434 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
If you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7573X vs Intel Xeon Gold 6434 and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Gears 5, PCMark 10, PassMark, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, RealBench, 3DMark, SuperPi, Blender, AIDA64, MATLAB, Blender, UserBenchmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6434 or AMD EPYC 7573X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7573X | 68% |
Xeon Gold 6434 | 62% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7573X is 8% better than Xeon Gold 6434. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7573X | 73% |
Xeon Gold 6434 | 64% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Control, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 129.7 | 112.8 | | Valorant | 147.4 | 128.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.6 | 71.8 | | Apex Legends | 138.6 | 120.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.6 | 96.1 | | Overwatch | 119.4 | 103.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 88.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 64.1 | | Warzone | 115.0 | 100.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 107.7 | | Valheim | 122.4 | 106.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7573X | 19% |
Xeon Gold 6434 | 27% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6434 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7573X as it consumes less power: 240W vs. 195W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 885 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7427 | 2858 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 329 | 1964 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15754 | 7051 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 824 | 1368 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 40983 | 40142 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 | | Single-Core | 1745 | 12464 | | Multi-Core | 60122 | 40862 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 | | Single-Core | 1400 | 1607 | | Multi-Core | 40906 | 24327 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7573X |
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | March 12, 2023 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA4677 | | Core name | Milan | Sapphire Rapids | | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | | Generation | 3 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 8 | | Threads | 64 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 76000 millions | 36000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 195 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC | | Max. Memory | | 4 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 22.5 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000506
100-000000506​WOF | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6434 is 24% better than EPYC 7573X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7573X has 24 more core than Xeon Gold 6434. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7573X is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6434 is better: 12
However, it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7573X and Intel Xeon Gold 6434 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7573X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon Gold 6434 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
