Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Core i3-6102E vs Intel Celeron J3455E gaming benchmark

Intel Core i3-6102E vs Intel Celeron J3455E

Processor comparisons   20-01-2022
   For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-6102E vs Intel Celeron J3455E and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Handbrake, PCMark 10, Blender, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, Gears 5, 7zip, 3DMark, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, SuperPi, WPrime, RealBench, Prime95, Blender.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Valheim
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Overwatch
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Apex Legends
  • Halo Infinite
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Death Stranding
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Valorant
  • Fortnite
  • Borderlands 3
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Fallout 76
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Last Man Standing

   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron J3455E or Intel Core i3-6102E.

 
Intel Core i3-6102E
Intel Celeron J3455E

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Core i3-6102E50% Celeron J3455E50%


Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
Core i3-6102E50% Celeron J3455E50%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Control, Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite89.189.2
Valorant101.3101.3
Cyberpunk 207756.756.7
Apex Legends95.295.2
Call of Duty Warzone76.076.0
Overwatch82.082.1
Red Dead Redemption 269.969.9
DOOM Eternal50.650.7
Warzone79.079.0
Assassin's Creed85.185.1
Valheim84.184.1
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
Core i3-6102E68% Celeron J3455E107%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron J3455E is more energy efficient than the Core i3-6102E since it has less power consumption: 25W vs. 10W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
Intel Core i3-6102E Intel Celeron J3455E
Cinbench 15 Single-core92103
Cinbench 15 Multi-core239247
Cinbench 20 Single-core235222
Cinbench 20 Multi-core555514
Cinbench 23 Single-core395555
Cinbench 23 Multi-core15331322

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i3-6102E Intel Celeron J3455E
Single-Core1057872
Multi-Core23562339

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i3-6102E Intel Celeron J3455E
Single-Core510323
Multi-Core11091139

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

Intel Core i3-6102E Intel Celeron J3455E
Announcement dateOctober 07, 2015April 01, 2020
TypeEmbeddedDesktop
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1296
Core nameSkylakeApollo Lake
Architecturex86x86
Generation68
Turbo Frequency2.3 MHz
Frequency1.9 MHz1.5 MHz
Cores24
Threads44
Bus rate8 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm14 nm
Transistors count2000 millions1300 millions
Power consumption (TDP)25 W10 W
Memory typeDDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s
LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Max. Memory64 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency
Memory bandwidth34.1 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache3 MB2 MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCYesNo
Part numberExpansion Options
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-6102E is 21% better than Celeron J3455E in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Celeron J3455E has 2 more core than Core i3-6102E. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-6102E is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron J3455E is better: 12
   The summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-6102E and Intel Celeron J3455E before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-6102E - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
Intel Celeron J3455E - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


Intel Core i3-6102E Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Celeron N4020


Intel Celeron J3455E Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands