|
Intel Core i5-L16G7 vs Intel Celeron J3455E |
|
Processor comparisons 11-01-2022 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-L16G7 vs Intel Celeron J3455E and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like UserBenchmark, Blender, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, Gears 5, RealBench, Prime95, 7zip, AIDA64, PCMark 10. Gaming performance of processors in: - Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron J3455E or Intel Core i5-L16G7.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-L16G7 | 51% |
Celeron J3455E | 50% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-L16G7 is 1% better than Celeron J3455E. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-L16G7 | 51% |
Celeron J3455E | 50% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Control, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.9 | 89.2 | Valorant | 102.2 | 101.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 56.7 | Apex Legends | 96.0 | 95.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.6 | 76.0 | Overwatch | 82.8 | 82.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.5 | 69.9 | DOOM Eternal | 51.1 | 50.7 | Warzone | 79.7 | 79.0 | Assassin's Creed | 85.8 | 85.1 | Valheim | 84.8 | 84.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-L16G7 | 430% |
Celeron J3455E | 107% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-L16G7 is more energy efficient than the Celeron J3455E as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 10W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
Intel Celeron J3455E | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 107 | 103 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 251 | 247 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 272 | 222 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 577 | 514 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 794 | 555 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1923 | 1322 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
Intel Celeron J3455E | Single-Core | 1605 | 872 | Multi-Core | 3297 | 2339 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
Intel Celeron J3455E | Single-Core | 905 | 323 | Multi-Core | 1869 | 1139 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
Intel Celeron J3455E | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FC-CSP1016 | FCBGA1296 | Core name | Lakefield | Apollo Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 8 | Turbo Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.3 MHz | Frequency | 1.4 MHz | 1.5 MHz | Cores | 5 | 4 | Threads | 5 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 1300 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4X 4267 POP Memory | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 34 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Celeron J3455E is 6% better than Core i5-L16G7 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-L16G7 has 1 more core than Celeron J3455E. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-L16G7 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron J3455E is better: 1 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-L16G7 and Intel Celeron J3455E before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-L16G7 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Intel Celeron J3455E Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
| |
|