Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Core m3-8100Y vs Intel Celeron J3455E gaming benchmark

Intel Core m3-8100Y vs Intel Celeron J3455E

Processor comparisons   18-01-2022
   Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core m3-8100Y vs Intel Celeron J3455E and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, rendering, video editing, programming. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Handbrake, 3DMark, Prime95, Blender, PassMark, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, Blender, Furmark, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, SuperPi.
   Gaming performance of processors in:
  • Valheim
  • Last Man Standing
  • Apex Legends
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Halo Infinite
  • Valorant
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Fortnite
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Borderlands 3
  • Overwatch
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Fallout 76
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Death Stranding

   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron J3455E or Intel Core m3-8100Y.

 
Intel Core m3-8100Y
Intel Celeron J3455E

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Core m3-8100Y50% Celeron J3455E50%


Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
Core m3-8100Y50% Celeron J3455E50%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite89.689.2
Valorant101.8101.3
Cyberpunk 207757.056.7
Apex Legends95.795.2
Call of Duty Warzone76.476.0
Overwatch82.582.1
Red Dead Redemption 270.369.9
DOOM Eternal50.950.7
Warzone79.479.0
Assassin's Creed85.585.1
Valheim84.584.1
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
Core m3-8100Y582% Celeron J3455E107%
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core m3-8100Y is more energy efficient than the Celeron J3455E since it has less power consumption: 5W vs. 10W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
Intel Core m3-8100Y Intel Celeron J3455E
Cinbench 15 Single-core93103
Cinbench 15 Multi-core176247
Cinbench 20 Single-core231222
Cinbench 20 Multi-core412514
Cinbench 23 Single-core411555
Cinbench 23 Multi-core15091322

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core m3-8100Y Intel Celeron J3455E
Single-Core1784872
Multi-Core30532339

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core m3-8100Y Intel Celeron J3455E
Single-Core873323
Multi-Core15841139

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

Intel Core m3-8100Y Intel Celeron J3455E
Announcement dateOctober 01, 2018April 01, 2020
TypeLaptopDesktop
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1296
Core nameAmber Lake YApollo Lake
Architecturex86x86
Generation88
Turbo Frequency3.4 MHz2.3 MHz
Frequency1.1 MHz1.5 MHz
Cores24
Threads44
Bus rate4 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm14 nm
Transistors count5700 millions1300 millions
Power consumption (TDP)5 W10 W
Memory typeLPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s
LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Max. Memory16 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency
Memory bandwidth33.3 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache4 MB2 MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoNo
Part numberExpansion Options
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Celeron J3455E is 26% better than Core m3-8100Y in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Celeron J3455E has 2 more core than Core m3-8100Y. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core m3-8100Y is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron J3455E is better: 7
   However, it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core m3-8100Y and Intel Celeron J3455E before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core m3-8100Y - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
Intel Celeron J3455E - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


Intel Core m3-8100Y Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-7101TE
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core i5-7287U


Intel Celeron J3455E Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands