|
Intel Celeron J3455E vs AMD Athlon PRO 300U |
|
Processor comparisons 24-05-2021 Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Celeron J3455E vs AMD Athlon PRO 300U and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, rendering. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Furmark, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, Handbrake, PassMark, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, WPrime, UserBenchmark, 7zip, Blender, AIDA64, RealBench, PCMark 10, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Athlon PRO 300U or Intel Celeron J3455E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Celeron J3455E | 50% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 51% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Athlon PRO 300U is 1% better than Celeron J3455E. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Celeron J3455E | 50% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.2 | 90.0 | Valorant | 101.3 | 102.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.7 | 57.3 | Apex Legends | 95.2 | 96.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.0 | 76.7 | Overwatch | 82.1 | 82.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 69.9 | 70.6 | DOOM Eternal | 50.7 | 51.1 | Warzone | 79.0 | 79.8 | Assassin's Creed | 85.1 | 85.9 | Valheim | 84.1 | 84.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Celeron J3455E | 107% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 165% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Athlon PRO 300U is more energy efficient than the Celeron J3455E since it has less power consumption: 10W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron J3455E |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 103 | 140 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 247 | 392 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 222 | 330 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 514 | 826 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 555 | 523 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1322 | 2520 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron J3455E |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Single-Core | 872 | 1870 | Multi-Core | 2339 | 4441 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron J3455E |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Single-Core | 323 | 746 | Multi-Core | 1139 | 1978 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Celeron J3455E |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1296 | FP5 | Core name | Apollo Lake | Raven Ridge | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 8 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Frequency | 1.5 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 1300 millions | 1600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2400 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | 384KB | L2 cache | | 1MB | L3 cache | 2 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YM300BC4T2OFG n/a
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Athlon PRO 300U is 37% better than Celeron J3455E in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Celeron J3455E has 2 more core than Athlon PRO 300U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron J3455E is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon PRO 300U is better: 27 However, it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Celeron J3455E and AMD Athlon PRO 300U before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron J3455E Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
AMD Athlon PRO 300U Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Athlon Gold 7220U
| |
|