|
AMD Athlon 320GE vs Intel Celeron G5920 |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD Athlon 320GE vs Intel Celeron G5920 and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, video editing, streaming, programming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, AIDA64, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, 7zip, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, PCMark 10, PassMark, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Gears 5, RealBench, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron G5920 or AMD Athlon 320GE.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Athlon 320GE | 51% |
Celeron G5920 | 50% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Athlon 320GE is 1% better than Celeron G5920. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Athlon 320GE | 51% |
Celeron G5920 | 50% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.3 | 89.7 | Valorant | 102.6 | 102.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.5 | 57.1 | Apex Legends | 96.5 | 95.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.0 | 76.5 | Overwatch | 83.1 | 82.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.8 | 70.4 | DOOM Eternal | 51.3 | 51.0 | Warzone | 80.1 | 79.5 | Assassin's Creed | 86.2 | 85.7 | Valheim | 85.2 | 84.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Athlon 320GE | 93% |
Celeron G5920 | 50% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Athlon 320GE is more energy efficient than the Celeron G5920 as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 58W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Athlon 320GE |
Intel Celeron G5920 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 93 | 149 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 490 | 266 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 234 | 368 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1068 | 628 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 603 | 379 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2903 | 1398 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Athlon 320GE |
Intel Celeron G5920 | Single-Core | 2181 | 2146 | Multi-Core | 5116 | 2831 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Athlon 320GE |
Intel Celeron G5920 | Single-Core | 980 | 878 | Multi-Core | 2274 | 1697 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Athlon 320GE |
Intel Celeron G5920 | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Picasso | Comet Lake | Architecture | Zen+ | x86 | Generation | 2 | 5 | Turbo Frequency | | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 2 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2200 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 58 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2667 | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 192KB | | L2 cache | 1MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 2 MB | Overclocking | Yes | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YD32GEC6M2OFH YD32GEC6FHBOX
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon 320GE is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron G5920 is better: 8 Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Athlon 320GE and Intel Celeron G5920 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Athlon 320GE Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K
Intel Celeron G5920 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
| |
|