|
Intel Core i3-10110Y vs Intel Celeron G5920 |
|
Processor comparisons 02-07-2021 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-10110Y vs Intel Celeron G5920 and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming, video editing. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Gears 5, Furmark, AIDA64, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, PassMark, MATLAB, 7zip, Prime95, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron G5920 or Intel Core i3-10110Y.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-10110Y | 51% |
Celeron G5920 | 50% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-10110Y is 1% better than Celeron G5920. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-10110Y | 50% |
Celeron G5920 | 50% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.7 | 89.7 | Valorant | 102.0 | 102.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.1 | 57.1 | Apex Legends | 95.9 | 95.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.5 | 76.5 | Overwatch | 82.6 | 82.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.4 | 70.4 | DOOM Eternal | 51.0 | 51.0 | Warzone | 79.5 | 79.5 | Assassin's Creed | 85.7 | 85.7 | Valheim | 84.6 | 84.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-10110Y | 444% |
Celeron G5920 | 50% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-10110Y is more energy efficient than the Celeron G5920 since it has less power consumption: 7W vs. 58W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-10110Y |
Intel Celeron G5920 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 105 | 149 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 272 | 266 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 268 | 368 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 632 | 628 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 450 | 379 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1746 | 1398 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10110Y |
Intel Celeron G5920 | Single-Core | 2271 | 2146 | Multi-Core | 3493 | 2831 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10110Y |
Intel Celeron G5920 | Single-Core | 934 | 878 | Multi-Core | 1712 | 1697 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-10110Y |
Intel Celeron G5920 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | UTFCBGA1377 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Amber Lake Y | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 5 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | | Frequency | 1 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 2 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 858 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 58 W | Memory type | LPDDR3-2133, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 33.33 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Celeron G5920 is 71% better than Core i3-10110Y in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10110Y is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron G5920 is better: 8 All the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-10110Y and Intel Celeron G5920 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-10110Y Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
Intel Celeron G5920 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
| |
|