|
Intel Core i3-7167U vs Intel Celeron G5920 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-7167U vs Intel Celeron G5920 and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing, streaming. Here you can find all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, AIDA64, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, MATLAB, Blender, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, PassMark, Handbrake, Prime95, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron G5920 or Intel Core i3-7167U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-7167U | 51% |
Celeron G5920 | 50% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-7167U is 1% better than Celeron G5920. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-7167U | 51% |
Celeron G5920 | 50% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.8 | 89.7 | Valorant | 102.1 | 102.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 57.1 | Apex Legends | 95.9 | 95.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.5 | 76.5 | Overwatch | 82.7 | 82.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.4 | 70.4 | DOOM Eternal | 51.0 | 51.0 | Warzone | 79.6 | 79.5 | Assassin's Creed | 85.7 | 85.7 | Valheim | 84.7 | 84.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-7167U | 94% |
Celeron G5920 | 50% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-7167U is more energy efficient than the Celeron G5920 since it has less power consumption: 28W vs. 58W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-7167U |
Intel Celeron G5920 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 120 | 149 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 306 | 266 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 267 | 368 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 629 | 628 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 448 | 379 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1739 | 1398 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-7167U |
Intel Celeron G5920 | Single-Core | 1852 | 2146 | Multi-Core | 3478 | 2831 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-7167U |
Intel Celeron G5920 | Single-Core | 793 | 878 | Multi-Core | 1772 | 1697 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-7167U |
Intel Celeron G5920 | Announcement date | March 07, 2017 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | Unknown | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Kaby Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 7 | 5 | Turbo Frequency | | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 2 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 28 W | 58 W | Memory type | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Celeron G5920 is 20% better than Core i3-7167U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-7167U is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron G5920 is better: 10 Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-7167U and Intel Celeron G5920 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-7167U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs 3015e • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
Intel Celeron G5920 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
| |
|