|
Intel Core i9-13900T vs Intel Core i5-13500 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i9-13900T vs Intel Core i5-13500 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning, video editing. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as PCMark 10, 3DMark, SuperPi, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Handbrake, WPrime, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Furmark, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, MATLAB. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13500 or Intel Core i9-13900T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13900T | 66% |
Core i5-13500 | 61% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900T is 7% better than Core i5-13500. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13900T | 63% |
Core i5-13500 | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 111.1 | 104.0 | Valorant | 126.3 | 118.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 70.7 | 66.2 | Apex Legends | 118.7 | 111.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 94.7 | 88.6 | Overwatch | 102.3 | 95.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 87.1 | 81.6 | DOOM Eternal | 63.1 | 59.1 | Warzone | 98.5 | 92.2 | Assassin's Creed | 106.1 | 99.3 | Valheim | 104.8 | 98.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13900T | 188% |
Core i5-13500 | 94% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900T is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13500 since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-13500 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 480 | 336 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5039 | 3353 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 799 | 549 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11203 | 7434 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2835 | 1895 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 32236 | 21360 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-13500 | Single-Core | 2591 | 1732 | Multi-Core | 54945 | 36394 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-13500 | Single-Core | 1974 | 1846 | Multi-Core | 22682 | 15694 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13900T |
Intel Core i5-13500 | Announcement date | January 24, 2023 | September 23, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 24 | 14 | Threads | 32 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 68 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 36 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900T is 35% better than Core i5-13500 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900T has 10 more core than Core i5-13500. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900T is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500 is better: 0 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-13900T and Intel Core i5-13500 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13900T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Intel Core i5-13500 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|