|
Intel Core i5-13500 vs AMD EPYC 72F3 |
|
Processor comparisons 12-10-2022 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-13500 vs AMD EPYC 72F3 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, Blender, AIDA64, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, PassMark, WPrime, Furmark, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Valheim
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 72F3 or Intel Core i5-13500.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13500 | 61% |
EPYC 72F3 | 60% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13500 is 1% better than EPYC 72F3. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13500 | 59% |
EPYC 72F3 | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 104.0 | 104.8 | Valorant | 118.2 | 119.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 66.2 | 66.7 | Apex Legends | 111.1 | 112.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.6 | 89.3 | Overwatch | 95.7 | 96.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.6 | 82.2 | DOOM Eternal | 59.1 | 59.6 | Warzone | 92.2 | 92.9 | Assassin's Creed | 99.3 | 100.0 | Valheim | 98.1 | 98.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13500 | 94% |
EPYC 72F3 | 25% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13500 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 72F3 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 180W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500 |
AMD EPYC 72F3 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 336 | 92 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3353 | 4125 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 549 | 178 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7434 | 8755 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1895 | 454 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 21360 | 22780 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500 |
AMD EPYC 72F3 | Single-Core | 1732 | 2006 | Multi-Core | 36394 | 33318 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500 |
AMD EPYC 72F3 | Single-Core | 1846 | 1389 | Multi-Core | 15694 | 16484 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13500 |
AMD EPYC 72F3 | Announcement date | September 23, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 13 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 14 | 64 | Threads | 20 | 128 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 46000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 180 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000327 100-100000327WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13500 is 19% better than EPYC 72F3 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 72F3 has 50 more core than Core i5-13500. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 72F3 is better: 20 Although it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13500 and AMD EPYC 72F3 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13500 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD EPYC 72F3 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|