|
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-9900X |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023 Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-9900X tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, Handbrake, Gears 5, 7zip, WPrime, MATLAB, Blender, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, Blender. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-9900X or Intel Core i5-13400F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13400F | 59% |
Core i9-9900X | 56% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400F is 5% better than Core i9-9900X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13400F | 57% |
Core i9-9900X | 56% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.6 | 100.3 | Valorant | 114.3 | 114.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.0 | 63.8 | Apex Legends | 107.4 | 107.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.7 | 85.5 | Overwatch | 92.6 | 92.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.9 | 78.7 | DOOM Eternal | 57.2 | 57.0 | Warzone | 89.2 | 88.9 | Assassin's Creed | 96.0 | 95.8 | Valheim | 94.9 | 94.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13400F | 94% |
Core i9-9900X | 25% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13400F is more energy efficient than the Core i9-9900X since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 165W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400F |
Intel Core i9-9900X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 282 | 197 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 2114 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 465 | 455 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6385 | 4855 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1622 | 1092 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18356 | 13662 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400F |
Intel Core i9-9900X | Single-Core | 1483 | 2633 | Multi-Core | 31282 | 21769 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400F |
Intel Core i9-9900X | Single-Core | 1837 | 1281 | Multi-Core | 12341 | 12077 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13400F |
Intel Core i9-9900X | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | October 01, 2018 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA2066 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 10 | 10 | Threads | 16 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 8600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 165 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 85 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 19.25 MB | Overclocking | Yes | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-9900X is 5% better than Core i5-13400F in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400F is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9900X is better: 5 However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13400F and Intel Core i9-9900X before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13400F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-9900X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i3-13300F
| |
|