 |
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i5-12500T |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i5-12500T tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, PCMark 10, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Blender, Handbrake, SuperPi, 3DMark, MATLAB, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Prime95, RealBench.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-12500T or Intel Core i5-13400F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13400F | 59% |
Core i5-12500T | 56% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400F is 5% better than Core i5-12500T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13400F | 57% |
Core i5-12500T | 55% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 100.6 | 96.9 | | Valorant | 114.3 | 110.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.0 | 61.7 | | Apex Legends | 107.4 | 103.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.7 | 82.6 | | Overwatch | 92.6 | 89.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.9 | 76.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.2 | 55.1 | | Warzone | 89.2 | 85.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.0 | 92.5 | | Valheim | 94.9 | 91.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13400F | 94% |
Core i5-12500T | 155% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-12500T is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13400F since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400F |
Intel Core i5-12500T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 282 | 289 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 2117 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 465 | 694 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6385 | 4807 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1622 | 1623 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18356 | 15847 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400F |
Intel Core i5-12500T | | Single-Core | 1483 | 3803 | | Multi-Core | 31282 | 22187 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400F |
Intel Core i5-12500T | | Single-Core | 1837 | 1634 | | Multi-Core | 12341 | 8748 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13400F |
Intel Core i5-12500T | | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 6 | | Threads | 16 | 12 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 10200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 35 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 18 MB | | Overclocking | Yes | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Core i5-13400F has 4 more core than Core i5-12500T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400F is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-12500T is better: 6
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13400F and Intel Core i5-12500T before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13400F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i5-12500T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
|
|
|
