 |
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE vs Intel Core i5-13400F |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE vs Intel Core i5-13400F tests and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, 3DMark, SuperPi, Blender, WPrime, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, Furmark, PCMark 10, RealBench, UserBenchmark, PassMark, AIDA64, MATLAB.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13400F or AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE | 53% |
Core i5-13400F | 59% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400F is 10% better than Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE | 52% |
Core i5-13400F | 57% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 93.2 | 100.6 | | Valorant | 106.0 | 114.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.3 | 64.0 | | Apex Legends | 99.6 | 107.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.5 | 85.7 | | Overwatch | 85.8 | 92.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.1 | 78.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.0 | 57.2 | | Warzone | 82.6 | 89.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 89.0 | 96.0 | | Valheim | 87.9 | 94.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE | 118% |
Core i5-13400F | 94% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13400F as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE |
Intel Core i5-13400F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 182 | 282 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 994 | 2875 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 461 | 465 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2303 | 6385 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1165 | 1622 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5664 | 18356 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE |
Intel Core i5-13400F | | Single-Core | 2620 | 1483 | | Multi-Core | 11576 | 31282 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE |
Intel Core i5-13400F | | Single-Core | 1239 | 1837 | | Multi-Core | 5135 | 12341 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE |
Intel Core i5-13400F | | Announcement date | July 21, 2020 | January 17, 2023 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1700 | | Core name | Renoir | Raptor Lake | | Architecture | Zen 2 | x86 | | Generation | 3 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4.6 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 10 | | Threads | 8 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 4000 millions | 14200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 256KB | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 2MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 20 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000154
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is 5% better than Core i5-13400F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13400F has 6 more core than Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400F is better: 31
However, it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE and Intel Core i5-13400F before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
Intel Core i5-13400F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
