 |
Intel Core i5-13420H vs Intel Core i9-10980HK |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13420H vs Intel Core i9-10980HK and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Gears 5, PCMark 10, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, WPrime, 7zip, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, 3DMark, RealBench, MATLAB, Prime95, Furmark, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10980HK or Intel Core i5-13420H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13420H | 57% |
Core i9-10980HK | 55% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13420H is 3% better than Core i9-10980HK. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13420H | 55% |
Core i9-10980HK | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 97.6 | 97.2 | | Valorant | 110.9 | 110.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.1 | 61.9 | | Apex Legends | 104.2 | 103.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 83.2 | 82.9 | | Overwatch | 89.8 | 89.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 76.5 | 76.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 55.4 | 55.2 | | Warzone | 86.5 | 86.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 93.1 | 92.8 | | Valheim | 92.0 | 91.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13420H | 102% |
Core i9-10980HK | 106% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10980HK is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13420H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13420H |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 201 | 219 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2207 | 1627 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 342 | 507 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4922 | 3643 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1238 | 1136 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14181 | 11013 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13420H |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | | Single-Core | 1130 | 2913 | | Multi-Core | 24178 | 16588 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13420H |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | | Single-Core | 1381 | 1437 | | Multi-Core | 9395 | 9056 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13420H |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | | Announcement date | January 11, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 5.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Threads | 12 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 2100 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13420H is 29% better than Core i9-10980HK in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13420H is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10980HK is better: 9
However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13420H and Intel Core i9-10980HK before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13420H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Core i9-10980HK Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
|
|
|
