 |
Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i9-10980HK |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023
For example you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i9-10980HK and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, video editing, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, 7zip, Gears 5, SuperPi, Prime95, PCMark 10, Furmark, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, 3DMark, Blender, PassMark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10980HK or Intel Core i9-13900H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13900H | 59% |
Core i9-10980HK | 55% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900H is 6% better than Core i9-10980HK. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13900H | 58% |
Core i9-10980HK | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.4 | 97.2 | | Valorant | 117.5 | 110.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.8 | 61.9 | | Apex Legends | 110.4 | 103.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.1 | 82.9 | | Overwatch | 95.2 | 89.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.1 | 76.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.7 | 55.2 | | Warzone | 91.6 | 86.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.7 | 92.8 | | Valheim | 97.5 | 91.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13900H | 139% |
Core i9-10980HK | 106% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10980HK as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 310 | 219 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2979 | 1627 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 499 | 507 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6586 | 3643 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1688 | 1136 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18891 | 11013 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | | Single-Core | 1545 | 2913 | | Multi-Core | 32177 | 16588 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | | Single-Core | 1884 | 1437 | | Multi-Core | 15080 | 9056 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 5.3 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 2.4 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 8 | | Threads | 20 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 2100 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900H is 41% better than Core i9-10980HK in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900H has 6 more core than Core i9-10980HK. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900H is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10980HK is better: 4
Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-13900H and Intel Core i9-10980HK before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13900H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-10980HK Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
|
|
|
